```
Last updated: Jun 3, 2024
```

If we’re working together, I hope this doc makes our collaboration smoother and more transparent.¹ These are the standards I attach myself to that optimize my performance at work. Every preference or strength can also be a weakness, so counter-views are listed as well. Feedback and additional counter-views encouraged.

### **1. Death before thrash**

What is the most succinct option in the most appropriate channel?

* Minimize need for back-and-forth

* For maximum visibility for the appropriate audience

* Framed at the right altitude with the right context²

  * Instant notice and respect of **`cmd+f`** usage

* *"I have only made this letter longer because I have not had the time to make it shorter."* ³

  * It is deeply appreciated when effort is made

* Banter, yes. Less noise, less irrelevant information

* Counter:

  * There is not always enough time to be superbly concise

  * It is unrealistic and not always productive to expect certain roles to do comprehensive research of internal docs before contributing to a conversation

  * “Banter” and “noise” is too subjective

### **2. Bias for direct feedback**

I pursue work that enables strong feedback cycles

* Bias toward working with people that give timely and actionable feedback

* Counter:

  * It overlooks working with people looking to improve their feedback skills or aren’t direct communicators, who may also be great collaborators

  * It overlooks great opportunities that don’t have strong feedback mechanisms set in place yet

### **3. Do what you say**

Self-awareness and commitment over idealism or indecision

* ❌ “I might be able to help.”

  * Building on #1, this doesn’t meaningfully move the conversation forward

* ✅ “I’ll e-mail you a first draft by Tuesday at noon.”

* ✅ “I’m not taking on any new projects until Q3.” ⁴

* Counter:

  * Forecasting work amidst shifting priorities can be hard

While I do not always meet the standards of my own preference, I thrive under these conditions. Notice of inconsistency or hypocrisy is a welcome conversation.

**What are your ways of working?** Can collaborative compatibility be evaluated by exchanging credos? Say hello and drop me a line—let’s find out!

---

1. Inspired by *Lily Konings, “[How to work with Lily](https://grey-animal-909.notion.site/How-to-work-with-Lily-c5ad60f5b63d42f5b413acfe09b52c1c)”*

2. *Wes Kao, “[The unspoken skill of finesse](https://newsletter.weskao.com/p/the-unspoken-skill-of-finesse?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2)”*

3. *Blaise Pascal, (1623-1662) “Lettres provinciales”*

4. *Lenny Rachitsky, “[On saying no](https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/how-to-say-no)”*

My work credo

Design advocacy at Figma

An insider’s guide to a seamless Figma migration

Taiwanese food starter kit

Interview with Lover's Magazine

Variable fonts playground

Schema 2021

Figma Japan 2nd anniversary

Canvas design system

Jira widget

Schema 2022

Figma Japan launch

Design advocacy

Design

Clara Ujiie

2024